This is a plan, not a write-up. I haven’t sat down with FreeBSD’s new AI-policy discussion yet. After Asahi’s GPL move and LLM rules, and a plan to actually read Asahi’s policy, I want to put the two projects side by side.
The plan
- Read FreeBSD’s Q3 2026 status report, especially the developer poll (88% want a policy) and whatever the AI working group has published so far.
- Re-read Asahi’s progress report and LLM contribution policy, and jot down where they agree or clash: disclosure, rejection, docs, and license.
- Note what each approach would mean for someone packaging or contributing from an Omarchy box, without actually sending any patches.
- Write up questions, not conclusions, and wait for FreeBSD’s Q4 draft before I treat anything as settled.
Questions I want answered
- Is disclosure enough, or do you have to ban generated code the way Asahi leans?
- How do the two projects talk about review burden?
- What’s actually written down versus what’s still a poll result?
God Bless, and Happy hacking!
